Does The Punishment Fit The Crime ?
News1 min ago
Farage Wants To Repeal Anti-Race Discrimination Laws
http://
Anybody who is still unsure whether to vote for UKIP or not in a few weeks time had better see this.
He wants to repeal anti-race discrimination laws ! This will never happen, of course, because Farage and UKIP will never win a General Election ! But the fact that he has said this, is still atrocious .
My Dad had to put with signs saying " No Blacks, no Irish and no dogs" when he was a young man in post war Britain. If Farage had his way, these signs would appear outside the factory gate, all over again.
A quote from the BBC link :::: When asked if he would retain a ban on discrimination on the grounds of race or colour, he said: "No... because we take the view, we are colour-blind. We as a party are colour-blind."
If anybody else wants a reason that Farage and his Party are constantly exposed to ridicule, they need look no further.
Anybody who is still unsure whether to vote for UKIP or not in a few weeks time had better see this.
He wants to repeal anti-race discrimination laws ! This will never happen, of course, because Farage and UKIP will never win a General Election ! But the fact that he has said this, is still atrocious .
My Dad had to put with signs saying " No Blacks, no Irish and no dogs" when he was a young man in post war Britain. If Farage had his way, these signs would appear outside the factory gate, all over again.
A quote from the BBC link :::: When asked if he would retain a ban on discrimination on the grounds of race or colour, he said: "No... because we take the view, we are colour-blind. We as a party are colour-blind."
If anybody else wants a reason that Farage and his Party are constantly exposed to ridicule, they need look no further.
Answers
Firstly we are not in Canada or Australia, we are in the European Union that has a policy of free movement. Secondly there are areas that would not give an Eastern European or a Muslim or someone who is black a job because they don't feel that the individual is 'right for the job' ie not white anglo. That is wrong and we need to maintain these laws or what will be the...
09:45 Thu 12th Mar 2015
Oh, so if I want my race discrimination thread to run to 4+ pages, I have to put "Farage" somwhere in the first few words, do I? I see.
http://
http://
"Oh, so if I want my race discrimination thread to run to 4+ pages, I have to put "Farage"..."
Hypognosis, any mention of race, racism etc is usually enough for the hysteria and scaremongering to start but yeh, defo add the name Farage in the title alongside any reference to racism and the thread should quickly fill up with silly nonsense from the gullible.
Hypognosis, any mention of race, racism etc is usually enough for the hysteria and scaremongering to start but yeh, defo add the name Farage in the title alongside any reference to racism and the thread should quickly fill up with silly nonsense from the gullible.
sp, //It most certainly isn't - and I'm eager to hear an explanation from those who think that Farage is talking sense.
Seriously.
Anyone.//
Yes. Me. Seriously.
If the law dictates, citing discrimination, that I can’t fire an employee who refuses to do the job he was hired to do, something is very, very wrong, and therefore that law either needs to be repealed.
Seriously.
Anyone.//
Yes. Me. Seriously.
If the law dictates, citing discrimination, that I can’t fire an employee who refuses to do the job he was hired to do, something is very, very wrong, and therefore that law either needs to be repealed.
naomi24
The law you cite does not exist.
Also...that's nothing to do with Farage's argument.
His argument doesn't make sense (have a look at the link - you'll see what I mean).
I'm going to leave this thread and have a look at it tomorrow afternoon...and I'm fairly sure that no-one will be able to construct a reasonable explanation as to what Farage is going on about...because it was a rushed response.
Nothing I've read thus far has convinced me that he knew what the end of the sentence was going to be when he started it.
The law you cite does not exist.
Also...that's nothing to do with Farage's argument.
His argument doesn't make sense (have a look at the link - you'll see what I mean).
I'm going to leave this thread and have a look at it tomorrow afternoon...and I'm fairly sure that no-one will be able to construct a reasonable explanation as to what Farage is going on about...because it was a rushed response.
Nothing I've read thus far has convinced me that he knew what the end of the sentence was going to be when he started it.
-- answer removed --
Latest Posts
Crosswords7 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles10 mins ago
News28 mins ago
We’re Doomed Under A Labour...
News51 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.