Donate SIGN UP

Answers

81 to 100 of 183rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Last

Avatar Image
This whole process was never going to be a cakewalk, which in itself raised issues which would end in a verbal bun fight. Still, hopefully not many tiers were shed by those who made a stand and everybody will get their slice........ I’ll get me coat!
11:55 Wed 10th Oct 2018
Will be interested to read the judges' explanation. Baking a cake is a professional service, and it is (or rather, should be) illegal to discriminate against people based on their sexuality.
Krom

//..Baking a cake is a professional service, and it is (or rather, should be) illegal to discriminate against people based on their sexuality..//

But they did not discriminate against the guy's sexuality , and did not refuse to perform their professional service - i.e. to bake a cake
Unless I've seriously misunderstood this, I think that they did refuse to perform the service.

//His order was initially accepted at a branch of Ashers in Belfast city centre, but two days later the baking firm's head office contacted Mr Lee to say the firm would not make the cake.//

I understand the free speech argument about the slogan, but I don't find it very convincing. The only possible reason that they could think the slogan is inconsistent with their faith is if they think being gay is wrong.
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2017-0020-judgment.pdf

" In a nutshell, the objection was to the message and not to any particular person or persons." [para 34]

The SC's argument essentially is that if anyone could have walked in and asked for the cake to be baked, and the reply was the same (ie, "no"), then there's no discrimination against the person making the request.
I suppose by the letter of the law (which is whst they were ruling on), that makes sense. I don't think this sets a happy precedent though.
I haven't read the judgement in full, but I'm interested to note that in paragraphs 59-62 of the judgement, full and considered attention has been given to a similar case that was recently brought to the US Supreme Court.
Do you have a link to it? I'd like to read it. Maybe I'm being stupid but I didn't notice a link in the article.
I provided the link above already.
Imagine the furore if the baking company had offered to make fairy cakes instead......
Ah, sorry, Jim.
A victory for common sense, and decency.
Nothing whatsoever to do with decency.....although I suspect that the ruling is, in the final analysis, the correct one.
Glad they won.
Decency???
Absolutely decency. A respect for a normal persons beliefs and civilised outlooks.
krom

//...The only possible reason that they could think the slogan is inconsistent with their faith is if they think being gay is wrong.//

Well yes - that is what they believe
Question Author
Peter Tatchell agrees with the ruling. Case closed.
Where was" Mrs Cakeworthy" on that day ?.
Good news.
Indeed common sense prevails.
Imagine a Jewish baker being asked to put a swastika on a cake?

81 to 100 of 183rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Cake Off?

Answer Question >>