There's nothing I've said in this thread that is threatening. It should be clear that my "taken out and shot" comment was deliberate hyperbole, and not at all meant seriously. I'm surprised that you've responded to it with some suggestion that I should be "ashamed of myself".
Humour doesn't always translate well in text, and I appreciate that -- and it's perhaps bold of me to assume that I'm being "humorous" anyway -- but at best it was a poor attempt at humour, rather than a cause for shame.
I can't vouch for my mood or intent when I wrote the "slap" comment, some years ago now, but then Naomi's also got the habit of reading the worst intentions into what I write, and then quoting them years later and repeatedly without context at every opportunity. Communication does indeed depend on the speaker; but also the listener, to perhaps a lesser extent. After all, as you (Andy) have already said, some people have their antennae attuned to the "unfeasibly sensitive" setting. This thread is literally discussing an example of a speaker being plain in their meaning, and a listener misconstruing it. It's a mistake to assume that such "unfeasibly sensitive" listeners, those with a victim mentality, are confined to minorities.
I'm not convinced then that I have anything to be ashamed of, and certainly not when the call to feel ashamed comes from people too quick to judge an entire group of people by the actions of a few, based on a article by a media outlet with a very clear and unfortunate agenda in this topic.