What with Harry's extraordinary attack on his brother and Meghan's take on Meghan being perfection personified, can the rift ever be healed?
Harry spoke quite wistfully, I thought, of his life with his family, an impression that didn’t diminish when he referred to his Californian residence as 'home sweet home' and said this is where he is meant to be, or words to that effect. Somehow I couldn't quite believe he meant it. It's all so very sad.
Vast number of people believe every word printed about this couple. If you look at this thread you'd believe that the AnswerBank is populated by people who appear in Harry's Rolodex.
I have no strong feelings about the whole situation but Meghan has been and will continue to be bloody awesome for the RF in the same way that Alexis Carrignton revived Dynasty back in the 80s.
She is a villain whom everyone can focus their ire on. In the ongoing soap opera that is the RF, Meghan is better value than Dame Joan Collins ever was.
I don't have much time for royal nonsense; but as far as I can tell, Harry & Megan seem to have deliberately set out to create a permanent break, no way back. Which is surprising for Harry since it almost seems as if he doesn't feel genetically related to the rest of the Windsors somehow, and wants nothing to do with them. In fact it almost as if he is holding a grudge at being put in the position of a life of privilege in the first place. Perhaps if one feels like that, a clear break is not such a bad idea after all. If pnly they could do it more privately and stop bunging up the newspapers with their antics.
Can I just add that I don't base my remarks on media. I base them on what I have seen from Harry and Megan themselves and some very bad acting and fabricion in the film they have put together.
Suppose someone committed an act considered of national interest. Anything. Say a great train robbery. Does it get into the papers because a great train robbery occurred, or because newspapers decided to print it ? The comparison isn't a real one is it ? It's not either/or. If the incident doesn't exist it doesn't get reported.
SP, she was still Diana, Princess of Wales after the divorce.
My point exactly. At the time of the Panorama interview I remember she was accused in many areas of the media, and by a large number of the public, of trying to destroy the RF.
And SHE kept her royal title after the divorce, so H&M surely should?