Harry is looking for sympathy, which is never going to happen because he has the word 'Prince' in front of his name, and understanding from a world that really doesn't care.
Being a member of the Royal Family is similar to driving on the M25, day in, day out. One just keeps on going praying not to have a puncture. Who wants to get the spare out on a merry-go-round?
18:30 Thu, Harry isn't being criticised because he has 'Prince' in front of his name - he's being criticised because he's a prize, self-obsessed, disloyal, lying plonker who should be thoroughly ashamed of himself.
Isn't the title of the book a reference to a "joke" his father made about him, with a reference to him not being his father.
Harry may be a messed up, angry young man, but his father is ... well word's can't describe how detestable, smug, sneering, adulterous, entitled that sad excuse for man is.
just get rid of Prince Harry and that will do the trick. as trump said, look there is a the second amendment as half the afghanis in America must be aware
i don't know how old you are, puzzled, but if you're much over (say) 40, you'll be unlikely to live long enough to see it, unless the monarchy were to be removed by force of revolution.
as no political party with any credible possibility of forming a government has abolition in their manifesto, it could be years before this gets to be voted on by the electorate. even then that's not to say such a policy would meet with universal support. even if it did, it would take years to enact the constitutional change required to remove the monarch as head of state.