rojash, in my last I did not accuse you of anything; I used what is called in debate an analogy, whereby one points out the fallacy in an argument by mooting a parallel argument where the fallacy is more obvious.
Failing to defend the islands properly no more 'caused' the Argentine invasion than the shortness of the girl's skirt would have 'caused' any subsequent rape. It might have made the idea of rape more attractive to a rapist ,just as my open window made theft more attractive to a thief.
But numerous law-abiding citizens would not have burgled my house or raped the girl, just as numerous law-abiding countries did not take advantage of our neglect by invading the islands.
That was done by a murderous, corrupt dictator for political glory. It was his ambition that caused it.
I'm glad you like my style of debate. I have often been complimented on my ability to think straight.
Anyway, as I said, the question has been answered and, in the process, I have discovered a lot about the attitude of some fellow ABers to democracy and the way they allow their dislike of one particular woman to cloud their judgment.