Crosswords1 min ago
Why Do They Question The Existence Of God?
159 Answers
One leading cause of atheism is religion.
Or they may proclaim, ‘I only believe what I see, and I can’t see any invisible Creator.
Or they may proclaim, ‘I only believe what I see, and I can’t see any invisible Creator.
Answers
"You ask for information as to where I get my posts from, then say I am advertising. If this is advertising, so is youtube and the other sites you post." No it isn't, don't be silly. If you want to present a citation to your quotes, I would encourage it. If you want to divert traffic from this site to another with the message "find the answers here," then it'll be...
14:43 Thu 21st Mar 2013
lazygun
"It is not difficult to see why people might tend to assume that a belief in some sort of creator entity is what motivates your contribution, although i agree assumption is not a good idea generally..."
you typed that after my reply to naomi
birdie
Steg -
After several exchanges between yourself and other members of AB it would appear that you believe the universe has always existed and was created by god.
also typed after my reply to naomi
and you want me to believe in your theories, you cant even read a thread lol
"It is not difficult to see why people might tend to assume that a belief in some sort of creator entity is what motivates your contribution, although i agree assumption is not a good idea generally..."
you typed that after my reply to naomi
birdie
Steg -
After several exchanges between yourself and other members of AB it would appear that you believe the universe has always existed and was created by god.
also typed after my reply to naomi
and you want me to believe in your theories, you cant even read a thread lol
"You ask for information as to where I get my posts from, then say I am advertising. If this is advertising, so is youtube and the other sites you post."
No it isn't, don't be silly.
If you want to present a citation to your quotes, I would encourage it.
If you want to divert traffic from this site to another with the message "find the answers here," then it'll be removed. Don't do it again.
No it isn't, don't be silly.
If you want to present a citation to your quotes, I would encourage it.
If you want to divert traffic from this site to another with the message "find the answers here," then it'll be removed. Don't do it again.
steg
naomi24
steg, thank you. So since you think the universe has existed forever I have to assume that you don't think an unknown supernatural entity commonly known as God created it.
steg
naomi
correct
for the hard of thinking
that is what i typed naomi, (sorry if you thought it was directed at you) it was to show that i had been asked by yourself and answered wither i believed god created the universe, because after that reply others were surmising (wrongly) that i did believe god created the universe
hopefully i have explained that ok
LG; I'm pleased you liked the quotation of Lao-tzu, though it would be nice if you enjoyed it and left it at that, you add; "although its not any kind of evidence of anything really." Well of course it isn't supposed to be, and as Ronald Reagan once said 'there you go again' - always wanting evidence of what is true, but no such evidence really exists for anything, even your assertions.
Oh, yeah, LG. Faulty orrery. Couldn't get it, myself. Yes, Mars seems to go backwards, a phenomenon laboriously and wrongly "explained" before, because of what a later Pope explained by "faulty exegesis". Translated into layman's English, that means "we misunderstood what the Bible said" ! A misreading which was not formally admitted for hundreds of years after Gaiileo. How careless, considering how many thousands of learned Catholics had been making the same mistake.
goodlife You haven't answered my or any other question in
Your Own Words .
Remember what I said: In your position //I would use my OWN words to prove those atheists wrong. Look at those atheist posts . Answer them . Prove them wrong . Try it ! //
I was told by an ex-JW that you are not allowed to answer in your own
words in case you say something that is not in Watch Tower. Is that true ?
Your Own Words .
Remember what I said: In your position //I would use my OWN words to prove those atheists wrong. Look at those atheist posts . Answer them . Prove them wrong . Try it ! //
I was told by an ex-JW that you are not allowed to answer in your own
words in case you say something that is not in Watch Tower. Is that true ?
Steg - “... birdie... and you want me to believe in your theories, you cant even read a thread lol...”
Where did I say I wanted you to believe in 'my' theories? I asked you to explain why you believe in the things you do and all you seem to be able to say is 'lol' which is the last vestige of the truly hard of thinking.
If you think that this is a reasonable and mature way to conduct yourself on threads such as these then you are very much mistaken. The fact that Goodlife has ranked one of your answers as the 'best' on this thread just goes to show how diabolically poor your answers have been.
Where did I say I wanted you to believe in 'my' theories? I asked you to explain why you believe in the things you do and all you seem to be able to say is 'lol' which is the last vestige of the truly hard of thinking.
If you think that this is a reasonable and mature way to conduct yourself on threads such as these then you are very much mistaken. The fact that Goodlife has ranked one of your answers as the 'best' on this thread just goes to show how diabolically poor your answers have been.
birdie this is getting ridiculous.
this is the what you asked me
"Anyway, since you appear to reject the the theory of an expanding universe and a big-bang event in favour of a steady-state universe created by god, I have two questions. Why do you believe this to be the case and on what evidence are you basing that belief?"
i have given you the answer over and over I DO NOT believe "in a steady-state universe created by god,"
sorry
you never asked me to believe in your theories,
and to lazygun as well
i new at the time i shouldn't of made the statement with the lol in it but still pressed submit.
"The fact that Goodlife has ranked one of your answers as the 'best' on this thread just goes to show how diabolically poor your answers have been."
The Ab Editor seems to have "best" answer...... is it ok to lol now ;)
(I did see i had the best answer though... and i would imagine it was changed AFTER you made the above statement)
this is the what you asked me
"Anyway, since you appear to reject the the theory of an expanding universe and a big-bang event in favour of a steady-state universe created by god, I have two questions. Why do you believe this to be the case and on what evidence are you basing that belief?"
i have given you the answer over and over I DO NOT believe "in a steady-state universe created by god,"
sorry
you never asked me to believe in your theories,
and to lazygun as well
i new at the time i shouldn't of made the statement with the lol in it but still pressed submit.
"The fact that Goodlife has ranked one of your answers as the 'best' on this thread just goes to show how diabolically poor your answers have been."
The Ab Editor seems to have "best" answer...... is it ok to lol now ;)
(I did see i had the best answer though... and i would imagine it was changed AFTER you made the above statement)
goodlife You don't deny that you JWs are not allowed to answer questions in your own words. So I assume the information I received from an ex-JW was correct.
That being the case, does the Watch Tower say why my belief in the
Invisible Pink Unicorn being the creator of the universe is incorrect.
Don't say it's incorrect because your god is the only creator and I musn't believe in another god. That's pure arrogance .
Tell me why I shouldn't believe in my IPU . He has all the attributes of yours plus so far he has answered all my prayers. e.g. I prayed for a win on the lottery to cover a visit to the dentist this week and sure enough it arrived yesterday.
That being the case, does the Watch Tower say why my belief in the
Invisible Pink Unicorn being the creator of the universe is incorrect.
Don't say it's incorrect because your god is the only creator and I musn't believe in another god. That's pure arrogance .
Tell me why I shouldn't believe in my IPU . He has all the attributes of yours plus so far he has answered all my prayers. e.g. I prayed for a win on the lottery to cover a visit to the dentist this week and sure enough it arrived yesterday.
Steg -
There appears to be some contradictions in your posts. You've most recently stated that, “... I DO NOT believe in a steady-state universe created by god...” [12:44 Fri 22nd Mar 2013 ]. However, earlier you said, “... i believe the universe is infinite and probably has always been here...” [19:25 Wed 20th Mar 2013].
Ignoring the 'god' aspect of the argument, a universe that has always been here is the very definition of a steady-state universe. Rather than tell us what you don't believe, it may be easier to tell us what you do believe ;-)
There appears to be some contradictions in your posts. You've most recently stated that, “... I DO NOT believe in a steady-state universe created by god...” [12:44 Fri 22nd Mar 2013 ]. However, earlier you said, “... i believe the universe is infinite and probably has always been here...” [19:25 Wed 20th Mar 2013].
Ignoring the 'god' aspect of the argument, a universe that has always been here is the very definition of a steady-state universe. Rather than tell us what you don't believe, it may be easier to tell us what you do believe ;-)
Khandro -
Before asking someone what the f. they are talking about, perhaps you should read and then re-read what they've said.
Since it's gone over your head, modeller's talking about the fact that most religions (with specific reference to Jehovah's Witnesses) claim that they are true based on the irrefutability of their particular deity. This kind of reasoning is circular in nature and is therefore invalid as a tool with which to measure anything, let alone the 'truth'.
Before asking someone what the f. they are talking about, perhaps you should read and then re-read what they've said.
Since it's gone over your head, modeller's talking about the fact that most religions (with specific reference to Jehovah's Witnesses) claim that they are true based on the irrefutability of their particular deity. This kind of reasoning is circular in nature and is therefore invalid as a tool with which to measure anything, let alone the 'truth'.
Latest Posts
News4 mins ago
Conspiracy Corner - Labour Helped Farage
News9 mins ago
Family & Relationships9 mins ago
News10 mins ago
