I was careful to make the point that the law is to be obeyed, regardless of wether or not it appears just or enforceable, both of which, as I pointed out, are separate issues. Whether Prince Harry should be in the spotlight or not is again, not the issue - the issue is the law, and laws are not the subject of arbitrary public opinion, or a rule by majority, and they are not repealed on the basis tyhat they are unenforcable. If that were the case, drinking and driving and 30mph speed limits, non-payment of income tax, and a whole host of others, would beat the queue for the hip and trendy arguments about canabis and drinking. Again, I don't wish to cloud the issue - I do have opinions on the canabis and drinking laws, but the difference is, I hold my opinion, the state holds the laws - only one is a matter of legal redress applied to everyone, regardless of age, or society status.