//You still don’t know what you’re talking about. Empirical evidence is just that.
Lambeth:
Black people make up a quarter of the population (25%) etc.//
And you still don’t understand what I’m saying (or you don’t read or deliberately ignore what I’ve written):
//If you wander round Brixton Market, Electric Avenue and the Acre Lane area, particularly at night, you will not see much of the diversity you mention and those out and about will most certainly not be reflective of the published ethnic make up of the borough as a whole.//
Brixton is not populated exclusively by black people. I never claimed it was. The London Borough of Hackney is not populated exclusively by Hasidic Jews. But if you go to parts of Stamford Hill you will find large concentrations of them and a large number of people you see will be of that type (in this case people you are very unlikely to see elsewhere except in a few other areas where they gather). They don’t go to Glastonbury either but they tend to gather together and live in the same areas. It’s what many people – especially minorities – often do.
There's nothing wrong with them gathering in Stamford Hill or with them not going to Glastonbury. It's what they've chosen to do. If Mr Henry had added, alongside his criticism of Glastonbury, a similar criticism of a place like the Four Aces (which I'm sure there are some about) he might have a valid point. But since he hasn't he just seems, like many of his ilk (not all of them black by any means) to want to highlight a problem that does not exist.